ACE Report Cover
Allograft versus FCR tendon autograft in CMC trapeziectomy and suspension-interposition arthroplasty
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
Language
Download
Cite
+ Favorites
AceReport Image
HAND & WRIST
Allograft versus FCR tendon autograft in CMC trapeziectomy and suspension-interposition arthroplasty .
Verified
This report has been verified by one or more authors of the original publication.

Trapeziectomy With Suspension-Interposition Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Use of Allograft Versus Flexor Carpi Radialis Tendon

J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Dec;42(12):978-986

60 patients with first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis were randomized to either the use of an allograft for suspension-interposition arthroplasty or to the use of a flexor carpi radialis tendon autograft. Patients were assessed for the primary outcome measure of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire over a 12-month follow-up. Results demonstrated no significant differences between groups from 6 weeks to 12 months postoperatively. The incidence of complications was higher among patients who were operated on using the allograft as opposed to the autograft.

Unlock the Full ACE Report

You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now

Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics

Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics

Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions

Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics

Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidence
content for as little as $1.99 per week.
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
You've reached your limit of 4 free articles views this month

Access to OrthoEvidence for as little as $1.99 per week.

Stay connected with latest evidence. Cancel at any time.
  • Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
  • Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
  • Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Upgrade
Welcome Back!
Forgot Password?
Start your FREE trial today!

Account will be affiliated with


OR
Forgot Password?

OR
Please check your email

If an account exists with the provided email address, a password reset email will be sent to you. If you don't see an email, please check your spam or junk folder.

For further assistance, contact our support team.

Translate ACE Report

OrthoEvidence utilizes a third-party translation service to make content accessible in multiple languages. Please note that while every effort is made to ensure accuracy, translations may not always be perfect.

Cite this ACE Report

OrthoEvidence. Allograft versus FCR tendon autograft in CMC trapeziectomy and suspension-interposition arthroplasty. ACE Report. 2018;7(5):25. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Show/allograft-versus-fcr-tendon-autograft-in-cmc-trapeziectomy-and-suspension-interposition-arthroplasty

Copy Citation
Please login to enable this feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into an active OrthoEvidence account. Please log in or create a FREE trial account.

Premium Member Feature

To access this feature, you must be logged into a premium OrthoEvidence account.

Share this ACE Report