All-Polyethylene Vs Metal-Backed Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis .
All-Polyethylene Versus Metal-Backed Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
J Arthroplasty . 2024 May;39(5):1353-1360.Nine studies including 1,405 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing all-polyethylene (AP) versus metal-backed (MB) tibial components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Pooled outcomes of interest included radiolucent lines, component positioning, knee scores, knee range of motion (ROM), quality of life, and postoperative complications. The frequency of radiolucent lines was significantly higher in the MB group than in the AP group, while no differences were found in clinical outcomes, quality of life, or complications. The main finding suggests that AP tibial components perform similarly or better than MB components without significant clinical disadvantages.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
0 of 4 monthly FREE articles unlocked
