AAOS: Joint preservation for displaced proximal humerus fractures improves Constant score .
A Meta-Analysis of Joint Preservation versus Arthroplasty for Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures
In this meta-analysis 4 randomized controlled trials and 8 cohort studies (total of 610 patients) examining the joint preservation and arthroplasty methods for displaced proximal humerus fractures were evaluated to determine which type of treatment was more effective. Following comparisons of outcomes from treatment methods, results indicated that joint preservation provided a significantly larger improvement in mean Constant scores than arthroplasty.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics