AAOS 2025: Comparing the Efficacy of Adductor Canal Pain Catheters Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Three-Arm, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Adductor Canal Pain Catheters following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Sixty opioid-naïve patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive a single-shot adductor canal block with placebo catheter (n=20), a continuous infusion catheter (n=20), or an intermittent bolus catheter (n=20). The primary outcome of interest was postoperative pain level. Secondary outcomes included duration of opioid use, oral morphine equivalents, length of stay, use of on-demand medication, and KOOS Jr. scores. Outcomes were assessed over 60 days postoperatively. Overall, the results of the study revealed no statistically significant differences between the three groups for any outcome, including pain scores, opioid use, or functional outcomes. These findings suggest that the use of adductor canal catheters, whether continuous or bolus, may not provide added benefit over a single-shot block in this population.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics