SPINE
Do analgesics improve functioning in patients with chronic low back pain? An explorative triple-blinded RCT
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
この研究はハイインパクトの可能性があります。
OEのAI駆動型ハイインパクト指標は、論文が掲載されたジャーナルと論文自体の科学的内容の両方からのシグナルを統合することで、論文が持つ可能性の高い影響力を推定します。
最先端の自然言語処理を用いて開発されたOEハイインパクトモデルは、ジャーナルのインパクトファクターのみよりも、研究の将来の引用実績をより正確に予測します。
これにより、臨床的に意義のある研究をより早く認識することが可能になり、読者は将来の診療を形成する可能性が最も高い論文に集中することができます。
OrthoEvidence Journal (OE Journal) - ACE Report
OE Journal. 2014;2(11):36 Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):800-650 patients suffering from chronic low back pain were randomized to investigate the effect of acetaminophen and tramadol in achieving favorable outcomes of function, self-reported disability, and pain relief in patients, when compared to a placebo administered over 2 weeks. The evidence presented in this study suggested that the use of acetaminophen and tramadol did not produce significant improvements in functional capacity or self-reported disability when compared to placebo in chronic low back pain patients. Further analysis pertaining to responders observed improved functioning as a result of treatment with analgesics, and responders reported lower catastrophizing scores.
Was the allocation sequence adequately generated?
Was allocation adequately concealed?
Blinding Treatment Providers: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Outcome Assessors: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Blinding Patients: Was knowledge of the allocated interventions adequately prevented?
Was loss to follow-up (missing outcome data) infrequent?
Are reports of the study free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting?
Were outcomes objective, patient-important and assessed in a manner to limit bias (ie. duplicate assessors, Independent assessors)?
Was the sample size sufficiently large to assure a balance of prognosis and sufficiently large number of outcome events?
Was investigator expertise/experience with both treatment and control techniques likely the same (ie.were criteria for surgeon participation/expertise provided)?
はい = 1
不確実＝0.5
無関係 = 0
いいえ = 0
報告基準評価では、著者が出版物内で試験の方法論的特徴や試験特性を報告する際の透明性を評価します。評価は以下の5つのカテゴリーに分類されます。
2/4
Randomization
3/4
Outcome Measurements
4/4
Inclusion / Exclusion
4/4
Therapy Description
3/4
Statistics
Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:255-65
Fragility Indexは、重要な所見の解釈を助けるツールで、結果の強さの尺度を提供します。Fragility Indexは、その所見が有意でなくなるために、二項対立の結果に追加する必要がある連続した事象の数を表します。数値が小さいほど弱い所見を表し、数値が大きいほど強い所見を表します。
なぜ今この研究が必要なのですか？
Sensitization following low back pain (LBP) contributes to chronic pain in the absence of tissue damage, and may result in functional disability. Non-specific LBP is frequently treated with analgesics such as acetaminophens, NSAIDs, tramadol, and opioids, in order to manage pain and restore function. The relationship between pain intensity and functional capacity remains controversial and this study was therefore needed to investigate the effect of a combination of analgesics on functional capacity and disability in chronic low back pain patients (CLBP).
主な研究課題は何ですか？
Is a combination of acetaminophen and tramadol over 2 weeks effective in achieving favorable outcomes of function, self-reported disability, and pain relief in patients suffering from CLPB?
重要な知見は？
- Primary outcome assessments of functional capacity (lifting, carrying, static bending, and dynamic bending) indicated no significant differences between placebo and analgesic groups (all p>0.05).
- 10 (42%) responders reported some or complete pain relief compared to 1 patient in the placebo group (p=0.005).
- Responders indicated a tendency to improve on lifting performance (p=0.10) with a significant reduction of RMDQ (From 12.0 to 10.5; p=0.02).
- Responders demonstrated a significantly lower score on subscale catastrophizing of the PCL (median 35.5 vs. 44.0 in non-responders; p=0.005). No other differences between responders and non-responders were noted.
最も覚えておくべきことは？
The use of acetaminophen and tramadol did not produce significant improvements in functional capacity of self-reported disability when compared to placebo in chronic low back pain patients. Note that a subgroup analysis suggested improved functioning as a result of treatment with analgesics, and responders reported lower catastrophizing scores.
それが私の患者ケアにどのように影響するか？
The evidence presented in this study demonstrated that analgesic treatment with acetaminophen and tramadol did not significantly affect functional outcome in patients suffering from low back. Large scale studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to investigate this relationship further.
免責事項
このページに記載されている内容は、情報提供のみを目的としたものであり、専門的な医療アドバイス、診断、治療の代わりとなるものではありません。治療が必要な場合は、必ず医師の診断を仰ぐか、最寄りの救急外来を受診してください。このページに記載されている内容に関して個人が表明した意見、信念、見解は、OrthoEvidenceの意見、信念、見解を反映するものではありません。
0の4 月間無料記事のロック解除
