Loading...
Search Filters
Date Range
toReport Types
Condition
Region of the Body
Specialties
See all (14)
Emerging Treatments
OE Recommends Topics
Multimedia
Journal
Conference Series
Evidence Series
Showing 1 - 11 of 11
No difference between Palamed G and Palacos R cements in total hip replacements
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Sep;88(9):1143-8.
No difference between Cemex Rx and Palacos R for THR
Acta Orthop. 2012 Dec;83(6):604-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.742392. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
No significant difference in 10-yr migration between high & low viscosity cement in THA
Acta Orthop. 2016 Oct;87(5):473-8
Long-Term Improved Knee Functionality in Uncemented Tantalum Metal vs Conventional Tibial Components
Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug-01;():. 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1448.R1
Peri-prosthetic bone density after cemented versus trabecular fixation
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery BR; 2011; 93(B); 1033-1044
Femoral aspect cementing unnecessary for young patients (< 60) undergoing TKA
Knee. 2009 Jun;16(3):200-6. Epub 2008 Dec 19
Cementless/screw fixation vs. cemented fixation of tibial component in young TKA patients
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jul;22(7):1585-90
Lateral release rates the same in fixed and mobile-bearing TKA
J Orthop Traumatol. 2015 Jun;16(2):87-90
Metasul metal-on-metal THRs have high rate of revision and incidences of radiolucent lines
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):881-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31067
No clinical difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing, cruciate-retaining TKA
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jun;23(6):1653-9.
Low- and high-dose TXA effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion needs in TKA
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Dec 5;14:340. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-340
Showing 1 - 11 of 11