3 reasons why P-values are dangerous .
P-values continue to dominate orthopaedic research despite offering limited insight into what truly matters for clinical decision-making. A non-significant P-value does not confirm two treatments are equivalent; it often reflects inadequate sample size rather than true similarity. Even when significant, a P-value reveals nothing about the magnitude of a treatment effect and is highly sensitive to study size, allowing small differences in large trials—or large differences in small trials—to appear equally “significant.” Most importantly, statistical significance does not guarantee clinical relevance, as differences reaching conventional thresholds may be too small to influence practice.
Unlock the Full original article
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this original article
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Are you affiliated with one of our partner associations?
Click here to gain complimentary access as part your association member benefits!