The 1 Thing You Need to Know When Interpreting Study Results with Confidence! .
Interpreting treatment comparisons often hinges too heavily on p-values, even though they say little about the real-world importance of an effect. The more meaningful statistic is the 95% confidence interval, which shows the range where the true effect is likely to fall. A trial comparing sliding hip screws with cancellous screws illustrates this well: the reported reduction in re-operation risk is meaningful only when viewed alongside its confidence interval, which indicates how precise that estimate is. Sample size is the key driver—larger studies create narrower, more reliable intervals, while smaller studies leave wide uncertainty despite statistically significant p-values. Evaluating whether a confidence interval exceeds a clinically important threshold is essential for determining whether a result should influence practice.
Unlock the Full original article
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this original article
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Are you affiliated with one of our partner associations?
Click here to gain complimentary access as part your association member benefits!