Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
RCT
ACE Report #9956
Ace Report Cover Physical Therapy & Rehab

OTA2017: Weight bearing vs non-weight bearing after surgical treatment of ankle fractures


Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Weight Bearing or Non-Weight Bearing After Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures: The WOW! Study. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Contributing Authors: MJ Segers P van der Zwaal RM Houwert DP Smeeing JP Briet EJ Verleisdonk F Hietbrink L Leenen Koen Lansink Stephan W.A.M. Van Zuthpen Bas Twigt Jochem M. Hoogendoorn

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

115 patients who had undergone the surgical fixation of supination external rotation type 2, 3, or 4 ankle fractures were randomized to three different forms of postoperative management; unprotected weight bearing, protected weight-bearing, and unprotected non-weight-bearing. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year. ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE

Please Login or Join to leave comments.