To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar 2-yr micromotion & clinical outcome with cement or hybrid fixation in revision TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
December 2016

Similar 2-yr micromotion & clinical outcome with cement or hybrid fixation in revision TKA

Vol: 5| Issue: 12| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

No Difference in Implant Micromotion Between Hybrid Fixation and Fully Cemented Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Radiostereometric Analysis of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Bone Loss

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Aug 17;98(16):1359-69

Contributing Authors:
PJ Heesterbeek AB Wymenga GG van Hellemondt

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

34 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either hybrid fixation, with cemented femoral components and cemented tibial baseplates with press-fit stems, or all-cement fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare three-dimensional component micromotion and functional outcome between groups over a 2-year follow-up. No significant differences in component transla...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue