LOGIN
No significant benefit of PSI over conventional instruments in total knee arthroplasty
November 2016
No significant benefit of PSI over conventional instruments in total knee arthroplasty
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation
Bone Joint J. 2016 Aug;98-B(8):1043-9Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
140 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to have the procedure completed with the use of either patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) or conventional intramedullary guides (CONV). The purpose of this study was to evaluate if patient-specific instrumentation afforded significantly better alignment of the lower limb, and individual component alignment. Postoperative alignm...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.