Lower 5-yr subsequent surgery rate with Mobi-C disc arthroplasty vs ACDF with allograft

Study Type:Therapy

OE Level Evidence:2

Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 May;24(5):734-45

Contributing Authors: RJ Jackson RJ Davis GA Hoffman HW Bae MS Hisey KD Kim SE Gaede PD Nunley

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

OE EXCLUSIVE

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Explore some of our unlocked reports below!

No clinically relevant difference between surgical methods for sciatica and herniated disc

Vertebral augmentation effective in osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture at 1 year

Varying naprapathy & manual therapy combinations similarly effective for neck/back pain

Fusion not necessary in addition to fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Lower 5-yr subsequent surgery rate with Mobi-C disc arthroplasty vs ACDF with allograft

OE EXCLUSIVE

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

Explore some of our unlocked reports below!

Continuing Medical Education Credits

Please be patient while we setup your OrthoEvidence account.

Please be patient
while we setup your
OrthoEvidence account.