To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

The use of BPTB or QSTG autograft during ACL reconstruction results in successful outcomes

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

The use of BPTB or QSTG autograft during ACL reconstruction results in successful outcomes

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:63| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws

Am J Sports Med. 2007 Mar;35(3):384-94. Epub 2007 Jan 11

Contributing Authors:
GB Maletis SL Cameron JJ Tengan RJ Burchette

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

99 patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery were randomized to either receive ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft or a quadruple semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autograft. This study aimed to compare the aforementioned techniques with respect to outcomes of function and stability. The results at the 2 year follow up period demonstrat...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue