To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference in 5-year PE wear between oxinium and cobalt chromium femoral heads in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
February 2016

No difference in 5-year PE wear between oxinium and cobalt chromium femoral heads in THA

Vol: 5| Issue: 2| Number:45| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Oxinium modular femoral heads do not reduce polyethylene wear in cemented total hip arthroplasty at five years: a randomised trial of 120 hips using radiostereometric analysis

Bone Joint J. 2015 Nov;97-B(11):1463-9

Contributing Authors:
BA Jonsson T Kadar LI Havelin K Haugan B Espehaug K Indrekvam O Furnes G Hallan

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

120 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomized to one of four different groups of bearing surfaces. Patients were randomized to one of two femoral head materials - either oxidized zirconium or cobalt chromium - and one of two acetabular component materials - either high-crosslinked or standard ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene. The purpose of the study was to compare prox...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue