To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Focused high-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis treatment

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
July 2015

Focused high-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy in plantar fasciitis treatment

Vol: 4| Issue: 7| Number:27| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Clinically relevant effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized, controlled multicenter study

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 6;97(9):701-8.

Contributing Authors:
H Gollwitzer A Saxena LA DiDomenico L Galli RT Bouché DS Caminear B Fullem JC Vester C Horn IJ Banke R Burgkart L Gerdesmeyer

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

250 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis were included in the study. Patients were randomized to receive treatment with focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (EWST) or a placebo treatment in order to determine the efficacy of the intervention. Primary outcomes of concern included overall reduction in heel pain, as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) composite score, and functional ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue