LOGIN
No benefit of PSI over conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
May 2015
No benefit of PSI over conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty
Orthopedics. 2015 Mar 1;38(3):e178-88Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Fourteen studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 7 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review examining the use of patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Studies were selected if they compared outcomes - including the incidence of outliers (>3 degree deviation from planned alignment), operative time, blood loss, and length ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.