
Hip resurfacing vs arthroplasty in terms of function outcomes and metal ion levels

Hip resurfacing vs arthroplasty in terms of function outcomes and metal ion levels
Metal ion levels and functional results following resurfacing hip arthroplasty versus conventional small-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; a 3 to 5 year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jan;30(1):61-7.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
82 patients scheduled to undergo primary hip replacement due to osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either resurfacing hip arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to assess whether hip resurfacing is associated with superior functional results, and evaluate metal ion blood levels as compared to standard hip arthroplasty. Results indicated that patients who had u...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.