Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures improves healing & function .
This report has been verified
by one or more authors of the
original publication.
Operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Nov;134(11):1493-500.6 randomized controlled trials (507 patients) were included in this meta-analysis to compare operative versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. The intent of this analysis was to determine whether operative treatment yields superior functional outcome, satisfactory fracture healing, and minimizes adverse events compared to nonoperative methods. While operative treatment did significantly improve functional outcome and fracture healing, it was accompanied by a greater rate of adverse events.
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics
Or upgrade today and gain access to all OrthoEvidencecontent for as little as $1.99 per week.
Already have an account? Log in
Are you affiliated with one of our partner associations?
Click here to gain complimentary access as part your association member benefits!
