To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

More pain at 6 months with non-cemented versus cemented tibial fixation in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

More pain at 6 months with non-cemented versus cemented tibial fixation in TKA

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:135| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Hydroxyapatite-Coated Tibial Implants Compared with Cemented Tibial Fixation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Trial of Outcomes at Five Years

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2204-11

Contributing Authors:
LA Beaupre M al-Yamani JR Huckell DW Johnston

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

81 patients were randomized to undergo one of two procedures for the treatment of primary total knee arthroplasty. One group received cementless tibial fixation with hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants while the second group received a cemented tibial fixation. Results were examined 5 years postoperatively with the primary outcomes of self-reported pain and function. Results showed comparable pr...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.