
Percutaneous compression plate vs proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric fracture

Percutaneous compression plate vs proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric fracture
Percutaneous compression plate versus proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treating elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized study
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Nov;18(6):977-86Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
90 elderly patients (>60 years of age) with intertrochanteric hip fractures underwent surgical implantation of a percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) or a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) device. The purpose was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes resulting from the differing treatment approaches. The PCCP resulted in reduced blood loss and shorter operation times compared...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.