LOGIN
COA 2013: unipedicular vs. bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty
December 2013
COA 2013: unipedicular vs. bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular percutaneous kyphoplasty for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Data from 7 randomized controlled trials including 440 patients, published between January 1980 and March 2013, was pooled to comparatively evaluate unipedicular and bipedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty (PKP). The evidence presented in this study revealed no significant differences between the two interventions in terms of VAS, ODI, radiographic outcomes, or complications. However longer operat...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.