To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Imbalance in content among evidence summary providers, with orthopaedics underrepresented

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2013

Imbalance in content among evidence summary providers, with orthopaedics underrepresented

Vol: 2| Issue: 9| Number:59| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Non-Clinical
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Orthopaedic Surgical Content Associated with Resources for Clinical Evidence

Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association. 2013. 34(01): 17-23

Contributing Authors:
SL Turvey N Hussain L Banfield M Bhandari

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

OE EXCLUSIVE

Dr. Mohit Bhandari discusses the under-representation of orthopaedics in popular evidence summary providers.

Synopsis

This research was conducted to determine the proportion of content relating to surgery and surgical specialties, particularly orthopaedics, within current evidence summary providers. Five resources (DynaMed, First Consult, PIER, UpToDate, and Clinical Evidence) were used for the comprehensive search for surgery-related content. Following the search, it was found that the 18% of the total content w...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue