To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Wear and migration of highly cross-linked and conventional cemented polyethylene cups

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

Wear and migration of highly cross-linked and conventional cemented polyethylene cups

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:111| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Wear and migration of highly cross-linked and conventional cemented polyethylene cups with cobalt chrome or Oxinium femoral heads: A randomized radiostereometric study of 150 patients

J Orthop Res. 2011 Aug;29(8):1222-9

Contributing Authors:
T Kadar G Hallan A Aamodt K Indrekvam M Badawy A Skredderstuen LI Havelin T Stokke K Haugan B Espehaug O Furnes

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

150 patients who were scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized to receive one of five implants: the highly cross-linked Reflection All-Poly XLPE cup or the non-irradiated counterpart, the non-cross-linked cemented Reflection All-Poly cup when articulated with Oxinium or cobalt chrome femoral heads, and the Charnley Ogee prostheses. The results from 2 year follow-up indicat...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue