To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

ACL reconstruction: Extra-articular procedure improves pivot-shift test; not Lachman test

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2013

ACL reconstruction: Extra-articular procedure improves pivot-shift test; not Lachman test

Vol: 2| Issue: 3| Number:129| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

An extra-articular procedure improves the clinical outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings in female athletes

Int Orthop. 2013 Feb;37(2):187-92. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1571-0. Epub 2012 May 24

Contributing Authors:
AP Vadala R Iorio A De Carli A Bonifazi C Iorio A Gatti C Rossi A Ferretti

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 women with chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) instability were randomized to determine the effect of an extra-articular procedure in addition to ACL reconstruction on knee stability following surgery. Patients were allocated to undergo reconstruction with or without extra-articular MacIntosh procedure modified by Cocker-Arnold, and were followed-up at a mean 44.6 months for knee stability...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue