To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

THA: Bone resorption of periprosthetic region reduced for up to a year with risedronate

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
November 2013

THA: Bone resorption of periprosthetic region reduced for up to a year with risedronate

Vol: 2| Issue: 10| Number:23| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

The effect of weekly risedronate on periprosthetic bone resorption following total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Oct 19;93(20):1857-64. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01646

Contributing Authors:
OG Skoldenberg MO Salemyr HS Boden TE Ahl PY Adolphson

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

73 patients were randomized to determine the effect of a bisphosphonate therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) of the periprosthetic regions following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients received either risedronate or a placebo once a week for 6 months, and were followed-up for 24 months postoperatively. Results indicated that bone resorption in the periprosthetic regions was reduced with risedr...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue