To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Dabigatran: potential higher risk of acute coronary event compared to other anticoagulants

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
September 2013

Dabigatran: potential higher risk of acute coronary event compared to other anticoagulants

Vol: 2| Issue: 8| Number:26| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Dabigatran association with higher risk of acute coronary events: meta-analysis of noninferiority randomized controlled trials

Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 12;172(5):397-402. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1666. Epub 2012 Jan 9

Contributing Authors:
K Uchino AV Hernandez

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

In this meta-analysis, 7 studies (30,514 participants with atrial fibrillation (AF)) reporting the risk of developing myocardial infarction (MI) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from the use of dabigatran etexilate were evaluated. In comparison to warfarin, enoxaparin, or placebo, results indicated that dabigatran was associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and acute corona...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue