To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2013

Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion

Vol: 2| Issue: 2| Number:265| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Randomized, prospective, and controlled clinical trial of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion

Spine J. 2008 May-Jun;8(3):436-42. Epub 2007 Jul 17.

Contributing Authors:
Kevin T Foley Thomas E Mroz Paul M Arnold Howard C Chandler Robert A Dixon Gerard J Girasole Kenneth L Renkens Daniel Riew Rick C Sasso Richard C Smith Howard Tung Daniel A Wecht Donald M Whiting

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

323 patients with compressed cervical nerve root and symptomatic radiculopathy, scheduled for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by the Smith-Robinson technique, were randomized to receive a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation or none after the surgery. PEMF stimulation led to significantly better fusion rates at 6 months after ACDF surgery with an allograft and an anterior...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue