LOGIN
Matrix-associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implant vs. Periosteal Flap Implant
July 2013
Matrix-associated Autologous Chondrocyte Implant vs. Periosteal Flap Implant
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Autologous chondrocyte implantation using the original periosteum-cover technique versus matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation: a randomized clinical trial
Am J Sports Med. 2010 May;38(5):924-33. Epub 2009 Dec 4Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
21 patients with symptomatic isolated full-thickness cartilage defects (4.1 +/- 0.09 cm2) at the femoral condyle were randomized to undergo either the matrix-associated autologous chrondocyte implantation (m-ACI) or periosteal flap autologous chrondocyte implantation (ACI-P). At 1 and 2 years follow up, the cartilage repair via matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implant (m-ACI) was found equ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.