To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Prolotherapy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy For Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2025

Prolotherapy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy For Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Vol: 307| Issue: 6| Number:33| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Chronic plantar fasciitis: which is more effective? Prolotherapy/extracorporeal shock wave therapy? A randomized controlled trial.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg . 2025 Apr 12;145(1):242.

Contributing Authors:
AU Baykut HEN Bayraktar HB Arslan E Yalçın İ Poyraz

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy patients with chronic plantar fasciitis were randomized to receive either ESWT (n=36) or prolotherapy (n=34). The primary outcome was pain intensity measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), plantar fascia thickness, and plantar pressure distribution. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-int...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue