To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Real Versus Sham-Based Neurodynamic Techniques in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2025

Real Versus Sham-Based Neurodynamic Techniques in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Vol: 307| Issue: 6| Number:4| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Real Versus Sham-Based Neurodynamic Techniques in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

J Clin Med . 2025 Mar 19;14(6):2096. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062096.

Contributing Authors:
T Wolny M Wieczorek

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Ninety-one patients with mild to moderate CuTS were randomized to receive either real neurodynamic techniques (n=48) or sham therapy (n=43). The primary outcomes were nerve conduction studies and ultrasound imaging of the ulnar nerve (cross-sectional area and shear modulus). Secondary outcomes included pain levels, two-point discrimination sensation, cutaneous sensory perception threshold, symptom...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue