
Real Versus Sham-Based Neurodynamic Techniques in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Real Versus Sham-Based Neurodynamic Techniques in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Real Versus Sham-Based Neurodynamic Techniques in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.
J Clin Med . 2025 Mar 19;14(6):2096. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062096.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Ninety-one patients with mild to moderate CuTS were randomized to receive either real neurodynamic techniques (n=48) or sham therapy (n=43). The primary outcomes were nerve conduction studies and ultrasound imaging of the ulnar nerve (cross-sectional area and shear modulus). Secondary outcomes included pain levels, two-point discrimination sensation, cutaneous sensory perception threshold, symptom...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.