To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Effectiveness of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization for Stability and Gait in Idiopathic Scoliosis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2025

Effectiveness of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization for Stability and Gait in Idiopathic Scoliosis

Vol: 307| Issue: 7| Number:70| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effectiveness of dynamic neuromuscular stabilization approach in lumbopelvic stability and gait parameters in individuals with idiopathic scoliosis: A randomized controlled trial.

Medicine (Baltimore) . 2025 Mar 21;104(12):e41905.

Contributing Authors:
RYL Ong D Thazhakkattu Vasu LK Jun NJ Yuet M Isaac Fernandez K Selvakumar J Ming Zi Goh

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Twenty-eight patients with mild to moderate idiopathic scoliosis were randomized to receive either dynamic neuromuscular stabilization plus core stability exercises (n=15) or core stability exercises alone (n=15). The primary outcome of interest was lumbopelvic stability, assessed via single leg squat. Secondary outcomes included core stability using the Sahrmann Core Stability Test, and gait para...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue