To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparing sutures vs staple skin closure and superficial surgical site infection

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2024

Comparing sutures vs staple skin closure and superficial surgical site infection

Vol: 306| Issue: 11| Number:40| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Wound healing after intracutaneous vs. staple-assisted skin closure in lumbar, non-instrumented spine surgery: a multicenter prospective randomized trial.

Acta Neurochir (Wien) . 2024 Aug 13;166(1):336.

Contributing Authors:
A Romagna J Lehmberg M Meier M Stelzer A Rezai JV Anton A Eckert CJ Griessenauer MN Bonk B Sommer E Shiban C Blume M Geroldinger C Schwartz

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Two hundred and seven patients undergoing non-instrumented lumbar spine surgery were randomized to receive either intracutaneous sutures (n=97) or staple-assisted closure (n=110). The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) within 30 days post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included skin closure duration, blood loss, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, and s...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue