To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Improved femoral outcomes & fewer complications with a novel full-process robotic hip system for THA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2025

Improved femoral outcomes & fewer complications with a novel full-process robotic hip system for THA

Vol: 307| Issue: 4| Number:10| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Improved radiographic outcomes and decreased complications rate on the femoral side can be achieved by a novel designed whole-process robotic assisted hip system for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

J Robot Surg . 2024 Feb 16;18(1):79.

Contributing Authors:
Z Huang Z Zhang W Wang G Wang X Lu H Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty-five patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for end-stage hip disease were randomized to receive either whole-process robotic assisted THA (RA-THA; n=31) or conventional THA (C-THA; n=34). The primary outcome of interest was femoral stem-related radiographic outcomes. Secondary outcomes included femoral side complications (notably subsidence and leg length discrepancy), clinical hip func...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue