Clinical & Radiological Outcomes Between Conventional Vs Patient-Specific Instrument TKA
Clinical & Radiological Outcomes Between Conventional Vs Patient-Specific Instrument TKA
A randomized, controlled trial of clinical and radiological outcomes between conventional and patient-specific instrument total knee arthroplasty using three-dimensional printing technique
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
One hundred patients with advanced osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n=50) or patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) TKA (n=50). The primary outcome of interest was the alignment of the mechanical axis and component positioning. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative parameters (operation time, tourniquet time, estimated blood loss, an...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.