To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Single Vs Double Coracoclavicular Loop Stabilization For Unstable Distal Clavicular Fractures

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2024

Single Vs Double Coracoclavicular Loop Stabilization For Unstable Distal Clavicular Fractures

Vol: 306| Issue: 8| Number:46| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Comparison of single versus double coracoclavicular loop stabilization technique for the management of unstable distal clavicular fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol . 2024 Feb;34(2):1009-1016.

Contributing Authors:
K Jitpakdee V Umprai S Srimongkolpitak C Jiamton T Laohathaimongkol

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Forty-six patients with unstable distal clavicular fractures were randomized to receive either single coracoclavicular (CC) loop stabilization (n=23) or double CC loop stabilization (n=23). Outcomes of interest included Constant scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), time to union, CC distance, and complications. Outcomes were assessed up t...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue