To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction vs Double Bundle

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2024

Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction vs Double Bundle

Vol: 306| Issue: 4| Number:39| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Yields Similar Clinical and Radiographic Results at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Contr

Arthroscopy . 2023 Dec;39(12):2502-2512.

Contributing Authors:
SS Lee KB Kwon J Lee DJ Ryu S Jang JH Wang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-four patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears were randomized to receive double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction (n=36) or combined single-bundle (SB) ACL and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction (n=38). The primary outcome of interest was postoperative clinical stability of the knee, measured by range of motion (ROM) assessments, the Lachman test, pivot shift test, anteri...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue