To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Impact of C3 Laminectomy On Cervical Sagittal Alignment In Cervical Laminoplasty

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2025

Impact of C3 Laminectomy On Cervical Sagittal Alignment In Cervical Laminoplasty

Vol: 307| Issue: 8| Number:105| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Impact of C3 laminectomy on cervical sagittal alignment in cervical laminoplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between C3 laminectomy with C4-C6 laminoplasty and C3-C6 laminoplasty.

Spine J . 2023 Nov;23(11):1674-1683.

Contributing Authors:
JH Kim WT Yuh J Han T Kim CH Lee CH Kim Y Choi CK Chung

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred twenty-two patients with cervical spon- dylotic myelopathy (CSM) or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) were randomized to C3 laminectomy + C4–C6 laminoplasty (LN; n=61) or C3–C6 laminoplasty (LP; n=61); modified intention-to-treat included 109 (LN n=51; LP n=58). The primary outcomes were C2–C7 Cobb angle (CA) and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Secondary outcomes...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue