To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Image-Derived Instrumentation with 3D Planning for Glenoid Component Placement in Reverse TSA

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2023

Image-Derived Instrumentation with 3D Planning for Glenoid Component Placement in Reverse TSA

Vol: 303| Issue: 9| Number:15| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Image-derived instrumentation vs. conventional instrumentation with 3D planning for glenoid component placement in reverse total shoulder replacements: a randomized controlled trial.

JSES Int. 2023 Apr 7;7(4):614-622.

Contributing Authors:
P Boekel M Rikard-Bell A Grant B Brandon K Doma WB O'Callaghan M Wilkinson L Morse

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

57 patients scheduled for a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were randomized to receive glenoid component placement with 3D-planning and image-derived instrumentation (IDI; n=31) or 3D-planning only (non-IDI; n=26). The outcomes of interest included the Constant-Murley score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), radiological outcomes, and compl...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue