LOGIN
Retractor-Endoscopic vs. Open Release of Carpal & Cubital Tunnel Syndromes
February 2023
Retractor-Endoscopic vs. Open Release of Carpal & Cubital Tunnel Syndromes
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
A prospective randomized study comparing retractor-endoscopic vs. open release of carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndromes
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;222: 107437.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Eighty patients with carpal tunnel (n=40) or cubital tunnel syndrome (n=40) were randomized to receive a retractor-endoscopic nerve decompression (n=47) or an open decompression (n=33). Outcomes of interest included operative time, McGowan score, neurophysiological data, Bishop Rating Scores (BRS), time to full functionality and duration of pain, the incidence of adverse events, and complications....
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.