To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Single-Site vs. Multi-Site Corticosteroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder: A Meta-Analysis

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2022

Single-Site vs. Multi-Site Corticosteroid Injection for Frozen Shoulder: A Meta-Analysis

Vol: 302| Issue: 4| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Single-Site Corticosteroid Injection Is as Effective as Multisite Corticosteroid Injection in the Nonsurgical Treatment of Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Sep 8;4(5):e1821-e1842.

Contributing Authors:
D Fan J Ma L Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Five randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis comparing single-site and multi-site corticosteroid injections for the treatment of frozen shoulder. Pooled outcomes of interest included pain on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and complications. Results revealed significantly better pooled range of motion in abd...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue