To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Routine Sterile Glove & Instrument Change at Wound Closure for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2022

Routine Sterile Glove & Instrument Change at Wound Closure for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection

Vol: 302| Issue: 4| Number:7| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection (ChEETAh): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries

Lancet. 2022 Nov 19;400(10365):1767-1776.

Contributing Authors:
Surgery NIHR Global Research Health Unit on Global

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

13,301 patients undergoing non-cesarean abdominal surgery were included in this cluster randomized trial in 7 low- and middle-income countries to assess whether the routine change of gloves and instruments before wound closure reduced the risk of surgical site infection. 7,157 were randomized to current/standard practice and 6,144 were randomized to the intervention group. The primary outcome of i...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue