To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Bandage vs. Rigid Immobilization for Torus Fractures of the Wrist in Children

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2022

Bandage vs. Rigid Immobilization for Torus Fractures of the Wrist in Children

Vol: 288| Issue: 1| Number:4| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Immobilisation of torus fractures of the wrist in children (FORCE): a randomised controlled equivalence trial in the UK

Lancet. 2022 Jul 2;400(10345): 39-47.

Contributing Authors:
DC Perry J Achten R Knight D Appelbe SJ Dutton M Dritsaki JM Mason DT Roland S Messahel J Widnall ML Costa PERUKI FORCE Collaborators in collaboration with

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Nine hundred and sixty-five pediatric patients were randomized to receive either a bandage (n=489) or a splint for rigid immobilization (n=476) for the treatment of distal torus fractures of the wrist. The primary outcome of this trial was pain intensity after 3 days using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery measured via the Patient Report Outcom...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue