To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Arthroscopic vs. Open Shoulder Stabilization with 15 Year Follow-up

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2021

Arthroscopic vs. Open Shoulder Stabilization with 15 Year Follow-up

Vol: 75| Issue: 1| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Arthroscopic Versus Open Anterior Shoulder Stabilization: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial With 15-Year Follow-up With an Assessment of the Glenoid Being "On-Track" and "Off-Track" as a Predictor of Failure.

Am J Sports Med . 2021 Jul;49(8):1999-2005.

Contributing Authors:
CR Bottoni JD Johnson L Zhou SG Raybin JS Shaha CA Cruz KK Lindell DC Thoma

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

A series of 60 patients with recurrent anterior should instability were randomized to receive either arthroscopic (n=28) or open (n=32) stabilization and were available at 15 year follow-up. The primary outcome of interest was clinical failure defined as recurrent dislocation or subjective instability. Secondary outcomes of interest were the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), the Simple ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue