To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Old vs New: 95° Angled Blade Plate vs Locking Condylar Plate for Distal Femoral Fracture Fixation

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2021

Old vs New: 95° Angled Blade Plate vs Locking Condylar Plate for Distal Femoral Fracture Fixation

Vol: 57| Issue: 1| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

New versus old: 95 degree angled blade plate versus distal femoral locking plate. A randomized clinical trial

Injury. 2021 Jun;52(6): 1563-1568.

Contributing Authors:
BM Patterson MA Breslin LK Wadenpfuhl HA Vallier

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-eight patients (79 fractures) with distal femoral fractures were randomized to receive surgical fracture fixation using a locking condylar plate (n=42) or a 95° angled blade plate (n=36). The primary outcome of interest was the rate of nonunion. Secondary outcomes of interest included the rate of secondary surgery and the rate of malunion. The mean follow-up time was 25 months post-operati...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue