Comparing Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion and Total Disc Replacement for Cervical Degeneration .
Efficacy and Safety of Total Disc Replacement compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Cervical Disease: A Meta-analysis.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Oct 15;45(20):1419-1425Fifteen randomized controlled trials with a total of 2677 cervical degenerative disease patients were included in this meta-analysis comparing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF; n=1237) or total disc replacement (TDR; n=1440). The primary outcomes of interest included the overall success rate and the incidence of adverse events. Other outcomes of interest included the neck disability index (NDI), NDI success rate, neurological success rate, reoperation rate, and patient satisfaction. All outcomes were assessed at 2 years follow-up and long-term (24-84 months) follow-up. Pooled results revealed that overall success rate was statistically significantly in favour of the ACDF group at both 2 years and long term follow up. However, pooled results revealed that patient satisfaction, incidence of secondary surgery, and neurological success rate were statistically significantly in favour of the TDR group at both timepoints. NDI success rate was not statistically significantly different at 2-year follow-up (p=0.07), but was statistically significantly in favour of the TDR at long-term follow-up (p=0.001).
Unlock the Full ACE Report
You have access to 4 more FREE articles this month.
Click below to unlock and view this ACE Reports
Unlock Now
Critical appraisals of the latest, high-impact randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in orthopaedics
Access to OrthoEvidence podcast content, including collaborations with the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, interviews with internationally recognized surgeons, and roundtable discussions on orthopaedic news and topics
Subscription to The Pulse, a twice-weekly evidence-based newsletter designed to help you make better clinical decisions
Exclusive access to original content articles, including in-house systematic reviews, and articles on health research methods and hot orthopaedic topics