To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Better accuracy, similar clinical outcome between navigation vs conventional alignment system in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2019

Better accuracy, similar clinical outcome between navigation vs conventional alignment system in TKA

Vol: 8| Issue: 7| Number:18| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A prospective randomized study comparing navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019 May-Aug;27(2):2309499019848079.

Contributing Authors:
V Kumar R Malhotra R Selvanayagam DN Srivastava VK Digge

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

50 patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for a unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive navigation-assisted or conventional prosthesis alignment. Outcomes of interest included alignment angles (mechanical axis, frontal femoral angle, frontal tibial angle, sagittal femoral angle, sagittal tibial angle, femoral component rotation), revision rate, and functional outcomes (W...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue