LOGIN
COA/ICORS2019: Fewer dressing changes but increase in blister formation with iNPWT in arthroplasty
July 2019
COA/ICORS2019: Fewer dressing changes but increase in blister formation with iNPWT in arthroplasty
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Standard Dressings in Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
5 studies were included in this meta-analysis which compared incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) and standard dressing in patients undergoing arthroplasty. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and Web of Science, as well as grey literature and trial registries, were searched for relevant articles. The results revealed no significant difference between iNPWT and sta...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.