To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar outcome, better 12mo DASH score with IM nail vs locking plate for clavicular shaft fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2019

Similar outcome, better 12mo DASH score with IM nail vs locking plate for clavicular shaft fractures

Vol: 8| Issue: 5| Number:32| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

The Effectiveness of a Flexible Locked Intramedullary Nail and an Anatomically Contoured Locked Plate to Treat Clavicular Shaft Fractures: A 1-Year Randomized Control Trial

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Apr 3;101(7):628-634. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00660

Contributing Authors:
A Ikram PR King MM Eken RP Lamberts

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

72 patients with clavicular shaft fractures were randomized to receive an open reduction and internal fixation procedure utilizing either a anatomically contoured locking plate or an intramedullary nail. The primary outcomes of interest included DASH scores, Constant Shoulder scores, and union rate. Secondary outcomes included operative time, incision length and the rate of hardware failure. Follo...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue