To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

PRP use in posterolateral lumbar fusion leads to increased rate of CT-assessed union after 2 years

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

PRP use in posterolateral lumbar fusion leads to increased rate of CT-assessed union after 2 years

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:25| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Platelet-rich plasma enhances bone union in posterolateral lumbar fusion: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):e34-e40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.167

Contributing Authors:
S Ohtori M Yamashita K Yamauchi S Orita K Takahashi J Nakamura H Kamoda M Ito Y Sakuma G Kubota Y Oikawa K Inage T Sainoh J Sato T Suzuki

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

62 patients scheduled for one- or two-level posterolateral lumbar fusion were randomized to a local bone autograft with or without the addition of platelet-rich plasma. Patients were assessed for bone fusion on CT, as well as clinical outcome on visual analog scales for back pain, leg pain, and leg numbness. Follow-up was scheduled for the first 2 years after surgery. For bone fusion, union rate a...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue