To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Better clinicoradiological results at 3 years with SpineJack vertebral augmentation vs BPK for VCFs

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

Better clinicoradiological results at 3 years with SpineJack vertebral augmentation vs BPK for VCFs

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:26| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Long-term safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack(R) procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study

Osteoporos Int. 2019 Mar;30(3):637-645. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4773-5

Contributing Authors:
DC Noriega B Toribio F Ardura F Rodriotaguez-Monsalve R Ramajo I Sanchez-Lite

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

30 patients with 1-2 osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures were randomized to vertebral augmentation surgery with either the SpineJack® implant or balloon kyphoplasty with the KyphX Xpander® implant. The purpose of the current study was to determine and compare 3-year outcome between groups. Clinical scores of visual analog pain scale and Oswestry Disability Index significantly favoured the...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue